Hoogs v. Robinson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “criminal conduct which has not culminated in a final conviction” remains relevant as an adverse discretionary factor when established by probative evidence
• holding that evidence of unfavorable conduct may be considered in discretionary determinations, even if it does not result in a conviction
• holding that IJs may consider unfavorable conduct and 19 “evidence of criminality” when determining whether discretionary relief from removal is 20 warranted
• holding that for discretionary relief the evidence of unfavorable conduct may be considered
• holding that evidence of unfavorable conduct that has not culminated in a final conviction under 755 Cite as 28 I&N Dec. 751 (BIA 2023) Interim Decision #4067 the INA may be considered in determining whether an applicant merits discretionary relief
• explaining that the BIA may “consider evidence of unfavorable conduct, including criminal conduct which has not culminated in a final conviction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).