Hoogovens Staal BV v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “as part of the final margin calculation, Commerce adjusts the U.S. price downward to reflect the amount of duty reimbursed to, or paid on behalf of, the importer”
• noting that Commerce is not required to adhere to its prior reasoning as long as it explains why it has changed its position
• “deducting antidumping duties as costs or import duties from U.S. price would, in effect, double-count the margin”
• “Presumably, an exporter will be reluctant to continue paying the cost of anti-dumping duties because the margin will increase ... each time Commerce reviews it.”
• “The Court can not [sic] consider evidence presented in the second administrative review when it reviews the first administrative review.”
• “Whatever additional information that persuaded Commerce that Hoogovens had discontinued its practice of reimbursing NVW during the second period of review was not a part of the record for this [first] review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).