Skip to main content
· 7/10/1957

Hood v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Rd. Co.

Citations

  • 166 Ohio St. (N.S.) 529

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • enjoining government from enforcing contraceptive mandate if written notice is provided to HHS stating that objectors “are non-profit organizations that hold themselves out as religious and have religious objections to providing coverage for contraceptive services”
  • granting injunction to plaintiffs pending appeal, noting, “The Court issues this order based on all the circumstances of the case, and this order should not be construed as an expression of the Court’s views on the merits.”
  • notice should be “in writing that they are non-profit organizations that hold themselves out as religious and have religious objections to providing coverage for contraceptive services”
  • notice should be “in writing that they are non-profit organizations that hold themselves out as religious and have religious objections to providing coverage for contraceptive services”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Herbert, Matthias, Stewart, Taft, Weygandt, Zimmebmah

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.