Hood Manufacturing Co. v. Matzger
Citations
- 107 Wash. 347
- 181 P. 863
- 1919 Wash. LEXIS 1015
Syllabus
<p>Landlord and Tenant (63)—Improvements — Cost. Where rental for a building was to be based on its cost, architect’s services (although his plans and specifications were deviated from by mutual agreement) and the salary of an adult son who kept books and assisted in overseeing the work, are properly chargeable as a part of the costs of the building.</p> <p>Same (63). In such a case, the cost of the building is not shown to be less than $6,500, from the fact that a contractor bid $5,300 on the main part of the building, where additional items brought the cost up to $7,000.</p>
Judges: Holcomb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.