Hood Ex Rel. Mississippi v. Microsoft Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Granting a stay is within the court’s discretion and a stay is appropriate when it serves the interests of judicial economy and efficiency.”
• “Granting a stay is within the court’s discretion and a stay is appropriate when it serves the interests of judicial economy and efficiency.”
• “Granting a stay is within the court’s discretion and a stay is appropriate when it serves the interests of judicial economy and efficiency.”
• “[V]iewing the complaint as a whole, this court is persuaded that plaintiff Hood has a ‘substantial stake’ in the outcome of this case. . . . In sum, this court concludes that the State of Mississippi is the real party in interest in this litigation.”
• “The fact that private 7 parties may benefit monetarily from a favorable resolution of this case does not minimize nor negate [the state’s] substantial interest.”
• in an action brought under state antitrust and consumer protection laws, holding that “the State has a quasi-sovereign interest in the economic well-being of its citizens, which includes securing the integrity of the marketplace”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).