Honolulu Paper Co. v. Kanne

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• comparing Costello v. Home Depot, supra (rejecting application of FWW method
• “[B]y its very nature, a case involving a misclassification does not contemplate the contemporaneous payment of overtime.”
• absence of a clear mutual understanding that the employer would use the FWW method
• “[T]his court concludes that an employee cannot achieve a clear, mutual understanding as to whether a fixed salary is intended to cover all hours worked unless that understanding includes some provision for the payment of overtime[.]”
• rejecting application of FWW method

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).