Honn v. City of Coon Rapids

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “traditional standard of review” for certio-rari review of quasi-judicial decisions is “whether the evidence provides a substantial basis for the decision”
• concluding that certiorari was not the proper procedure to address a city’s rezoning decision because “rezoning involves a legislative determination”
• noting that the arbitrariness inquiry in quasi-judicial actions focuses on whether the government action is in accord with the local ordinance
• noting that the arbitrariness inquiry in quasi-judicial actions focuses on whether the government action is in accord with the local ordinance
• stating that in legislative zoning decisions, a city considers a \a wide range of value judgments” and the \inquiry focuses on whether the proposed use promotes the public welfare”
• stating that in legislative zoning decisions, a city considers a \a wide range of value judgments\ and the \inquiry focuses on whether the proposed use promotes the public welfare\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).