Honigman v. Weitzman (In Re Delorean Motor Co.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an action arising from the efforts of trustees to administer the estate was within the scope of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334 and 157(b)
• holding that, because the issue of mandatory abstention turns upon jurisdiction questions and the construction of pertinent statutes, it is a question of law subject to de novo review
• holding that, because the issue of mandatory abstention turns upon jurisdiction questions and the construction of pertinent statutes, it is a question of law subject to de novo review
• holding that an otherwise non–core state law claim was inextricably tied to the determination of an administrative claim against the estate and similarly tied to questions concerning the proper administration of the estate
• holding that an otherwise non–core state law claim was inextricably tied to the determination of an adminis- trative claim against the estate and similarly tied to questions concerning the proper administration of the estate
• holding that an otherwise non–core state law claim was inextricably tied to the determination of an ad- ministrative claim against the estate and similarly tied to questions concerning the proper administration of the es- tate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).