Hong v. Kong

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claim for rescission and restitution was “an action in the nature of assumpsit”
• stating that \[t]he rescission of a contract for fraud in the inducement is part of the law of restitution\
• stating that “[t]he rescission of a contract for fraud in the inducement is part of the law of restitution”
• noting that \restitution is aimed at depriving the fraudulent party of benefits obtained by the tort\
• reviewing FOFs entered by the circuit court, citing Earl M. Jorgensen Co. and Fujioka, and declining to notice plain error because, inter alia, \consideration of the new issue will affect the integrity of the findings of fact\
• “Here, consideration of the new issue will affect the integrity of the findings of fact.... The new issue, furthermore, is of no great public import. Consequently, we exercise our discretion and decline to consider the issue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).