Hong v. Bennett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court's ruling in excluding evidence is reviewable under abuse-of-discretion standard
• holding chiropractor’s counteraffidavit was insufficient to controvert reasonableness and necessity of medical expenses of a physician, a radiologist, and a pharmacist because the chiropractor affiant failed to state how he was qualified to opine on those expenses
• reversing trial court’s judgment and remanding for new trial based on erroneous admission of section 18.001 affidavits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).