Skip to main content
· 6/30/2005

Honeywell International, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

Citations

  • 415 F.3d 429
  • 60 ERC (BNA) 2005
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 13112
  • 2005 WL 1531865

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In assessing whether the district court had subject matter jurisdiction, we generally look to the time at which the action commenced. However, a severed action must have an independent jurisdictional basis.” (citations omitted)
  • “Because the district court had federal question jurisdiction when Honeywell’s severed action commenced, it also had supplemental jurisdiction over Honeywell’s [state claims], even if Honeywell’s federal claim later ceased to present a viable theory of recovery.”
  • [A] severed action must have an independent jurisdictional basis.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reavley, Jones, Garza

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.