Skip to main content
· 6/12/1972

Honeywell, Inc. v. Elliott

Citations

  • 213 Va. 86
  • 189 S.E.2d 331
  • 1972 Va. LEXIS 311

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring clear intention to establish novation, which is never presumed, and finding evidence lacking
  • an essential requisite of a novation is “the validity of the new contract”
  • an essential requisite of a novation is “the validity of the new contract”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Snead, I'Anson, Harrison, Cochran, Harman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.