· 9/23/1982
Honeywell, Inc. v. Arnold Const. Co., Inc.
Citations
- 654 P.2d 301
- 134 Ariz. 153
- 1982 Ariz. App. LEXIS 559
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Federal Act followed because its notice period was the same as in the Little Miller Act
- “In order for a corporate ‘veil’ to be pierced, the corporation must be considered the alter ego of the individual whose property is sought.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Grant, Jacobson, Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.