Skip to main content
· 9/23/1982

Honeywell, Inc. v. Arnold Const. Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 654 P.2d 301
  • 134 Ariz. 153
  • 1982 Ariz. App. LEXIS 559

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Federal Act followed because its notice period was the same as in the Little Miller Act
  • “In order for a corporate ‘veil’ to be pierced, the corporation must be considered the alter ego of the individual whose property is sought.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grant, Jacobson, Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.