Skip to main content
· 6/2/1980

Honeycutt v. Ward

Citations

  • 446 U.S. 985
  • 100 S. Ct. 2969
  • 64 L. Ed. 2d 843
  • 1980 U.S. LEXIS 1934

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • commonality requirement not met where each department had its own promotion criteria and only centralized review was to ensure that each department adequately considered components in developing its own criteria and following them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.