Skip to main content
· 3/18/1996

Honeycutt v. Tour Carriage, Inc.

Citations

  • 997 F. Supp. 694
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21741
  • 1996 WL 933861

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because Plaintiff did not respond in opposition to any of the motions filed by Defendants, the undersigned finds the facts as presented by Defendants.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKNIGHT

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.