Hone v. Woodruff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing “defective products from those foods or drugs which necessarily involve some risk of harm”
• distinguishing “defective products from those foods or drugs which necessarily involve some risk of harm”
• product is of defective design “if (1) it is more dangerous than an ordinary consumer would expect when used in an intended or reasonably foreseeable manner, or (2
• substantial differences exist between negligence and strict liability theories
• product is of defective design “if (1) it is more dangerous than an ordinary consumer would expect when used in an intended or reasonably foreseeable manner, or (2) if the benefits of the challenged design do not outweigh the risk inherent in such design.” Id. at 466, 432 N.E.2d at 818

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).