Honda of America Mfg., Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that subject oil bolts facially meet heading 8708 as parts of an automobile “because they are ‘parts and accessories’ of vehicle power trains” or “of vehicle ‘brakes and servo-brakes’”
• “If the oil bolts are parts of general use, then they cannot fall under Honda’s proposed subheadings.”
• “[A]rticles that are ‘parts of general use’ . . . cannot be classified as ‘parts’ or ‘parts and accessories’ under Chapter 87.”
• “[A]n article’s specialization for vehicles does not preclude its classification as a part of general use.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).