Supreme Court of Virginia· 6/21/1923
Honaker v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 136 Va. 752
- 118 S.E. 85
- 1923 Va. LEXIS 127
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to consider the defendant’s “objection to the sufficiency of the indictment” because it lacked the date of the offense, when the defendant made “no demurrer or exception, nor [asked for] any instruction”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burks
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Spradlin v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1954-01-25· cited 48×
- Wolfe v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 2003-02-28· cited 35×
- Salyer v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1935-09-19· cited 2×
- Kevin Diaz Gomez, s/k/a Kevin Diaz-Gomez v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2020-06-09
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.