Homon v. Curtis
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 4322
Syllabus
Transcripts; App.R. 9; App.R. 10; R.C. 3109.051(K); Attorney's Fees; Court Costs. Defendant-appellant failed to provide the transcript necessary to resolve several of her assignments of error, so the trial court's decisions as to those assignments of error are affirmed. Where defendant-appellant requested attorney's fees and court costs and the trial court found the adverse party in contempt of court, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in deciding not to award appellant any attorney's fees, but it erred as a matter of law in failing to address the issue of court costs under R.C. 3109.051(K).
Judges: Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court· 1980-02-13· cited 2,064×
- State ex rel. Neil v. French (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-07-11· cited 101×
- State ex rel. Motley v. CapersOhio Supreme Court· 1986-04-09· cited 36×
- Hart v. SpenceleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-02-25· cited 14×
- Cichanowicz v. CichanowiczOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-23· cited 13×
- Frick v. HowellOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-01· cited 4×
- State v. MarksOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-10-07· cited 4×
- In re Estate of FrancisOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-04-04· cited 1×
- Baker v. Walmart Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-05-20· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.