Skip to main content
· 8/17/1998

Homestake Mining Company, of California, a California Corporation v. United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, Afl-Cio-Clc, Local 7044 Stacy Oberle

Citations

  • 153 F.3d 678
  • 1998 CCH OSHD 31,632
  • 158 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3101
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 20083
  • 1998 WL 477214

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that an arbitrator's award may be challenged on public policy grounds and may be overturned if \it is contrary to a well-defined and dominant policy embodied in laws and judicial precedent\
  • noting that an arbitrator's award may be challenged on public policy grounds and may be overturned if \it is contrary to a well-defined and dominant policy embodied in laws and judicial precedent\
  • where employer requested arbitrator to determine whether employer had just cause to discharge employee, employer cannot argue that arbitrator lacked authority to decide this issue
  • “[W]e will not give credence to [the party’s] argument that the arbitrator had no authority to decide an issue it agreed to submit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beam, Ross, Magill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.