Skip to main content
· 8/31/2005

Homes v. Cull

Citations

  • 173 S.W.3d 565
  • 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 7254
  • 2005 WL 2100472

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Appellants did not provide any evidence of the work done, time spent, or costs incurred that would not have been done or incurred in anticipation of an arbitration hearing.”
  • “Appellants did not provide any evidence of the work done, time spent, or costs incurred that would not have been done or incurred in anticipation of an arbitration hearing.”
  • applying TUCO in FAA case
  • applying TUCO in FAA case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dauphinot, Holman, Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.