· 8/31/2005
Homes v. Cull
Citations
- 173 S.W.3d 565
- 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 7254
- 2005 WL 2100472
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Appellants did not provide any evidence of the work done, time spent, or costs incurred that would not have been done or incurred in anticipation of an arbitration hearing.”
- “Appellants did not provide any evidence of the work done, time spent, or costs incurred that would not have been done or incurred in anticipation of an arbitration hearing.”
- applying TUCO in FAA case
- applying TUCO in FAA case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dauphinot, Holman, Walker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.