Homes & Son Construction Co., Inc. v. Bolo Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claim is liquidated if it provides sufficient information “to enable [a defendant] to ascertain the amount owed”
• explaining that “[m]ere differences of opinion as to the amount” of a judgment will not preclude awarding prejudgment interest
• claim on cost plus construction contract held to be liquidated even though there was considerable dispute as to the amount of cost
• claim on cost plus construction contract held to be liquidated even though there was considerable dispute as to the amount of cost
• prejudgment interest available for claims wherein the evidence furnishes data which, if believed, makes it possible to compute claim with exactness
• mere difference of opinion as to amount due does not preclude award of prejudgment interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).