Homer Merriman v. Xto Energy, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when party moves for summary judgment on both traditional and no-evidence grounds, appellate courts first address no-evidence grounds
• holding that nonmovant has the burden to produce summary judgment evidence on challenged elements
• holding that where both parties move for summary judgment and the trial court grants one motion and denies the other, \we determine all issues presented and render the judgment the trial court should have rendered\
• holding, when party moves for summary judgment on both traditional and no-evidence grounds, appellate courts first address no-evidence grounds
• stating that no-evidence summary judgment motion shifts burden to nonmovant to present evidence raising fact issue on each element challenged in motion
• stating that no-evidence motion for summary judgment shifts burden to nonmovant to present evidence raising fact issue on each element challenged in motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).