Skip to main content
· 12/19/2003

Homer L. Cook, Jr., Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

Citations

  • 353 F.3d 937
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 25810
  • 2003 WL 22971789

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that we have no jurisdiction to review abuses of discretion on factual matters
  • “This court is limited by its jurisdictional statute and, absent a constitutional issue, may not review challenges to factual determinations or challenges to the application of a law or regulation to facts.”
  • “Although Mr. Cook pre- sents his argument as a legal premise couched in terms of statutory interpretation, the review Mr. Cook requests ul- timately reduces to an application of the law to facts.”
  • “Although [the veteran] presents his argument as a legal premise couched in terms of statu- tory interpretation, the review [the veteran] requests ulti- mately reduces to an application of the law to facts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gajarsa, Linn, Prost

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.