HomEq Servicing Corp. v. Baker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• creating a bright-line rule that trial courts may not consider evidence in opposition to summary judgment after thirty-day response period has expired
• indicating a trial court cannot consider summary judgment filings subsequent to the 30-day period
• “At no time within thirty days 5 after service of the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment did the defendants request any alteration of the time limits imposed by Indiana Trial Rule 56.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).