HOMEOWNERS CHOICE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. PATRICK FRASER AND ALICE JACOBS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, without any showing of “substantive flaws” in the EIS, “[w]e need not determine the [agency’s] precise role in [the contractor’s] selection”
• holding that jurisdiction was proper pursuant to § 46110(a) to review an order concerning the funding of an airport project that was issued, in relevant part, pursuant to Part A
• excusing be- lated submission of standing evidence and arguments be- cause appellee would not be prejudiced
• looking to supplemental declarations submitted with reply brief to establish injury and, thus, standing
• affidavits submitted with reply brief are sufficient under Sierra Club because they made associational standing “patently obvious” and respondent was not prejudiced
• “The [agency] exercised its discretion to include the environmental justice analysis in its NEPA evaluation, and that analysis therefore is properly subject to arbitrary and capricious review under the APA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).