Skip to main content
· 4/24/1959

Homelite v. Trywilk Realty Co.

Citations

  • 172 F. Supp. 529
  • 1959 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3458

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding documents requested to be within the control of the named corporate party though not within its physical possession where nonparty corporations shared a common ownership with the party, one of the parties was the owner (directly and indirectly
  • “With regard to non-parties, Rule 34(c) contemplates that they may be required to produce documents through the use of a subpoena issued under Rule 45.”
  • “ ‘Control’ has been construed broadly by the courts as the legal right, authority, or practical ability to obtain the materials sought on demand.”
  • ordering production of documents in possession of affiliated corporation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warlick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.