· 4/25/1994
Homeland Stores, Inc. v. Resolution Trust Corporation, and Bob's Super Saver, Inc.
Citations
- 17 F.3d 1269
- 1994 WL 54915
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding administrative review process inapplicable to claims accruing after RTC’s appointment as receiver
- “In interpreting a statutory provision, context and structure are, as in examining any legal instrument, of substantial import in the interpretive exercise.” (quotation omitted)
- Homeland Stores’ claims arose solely from actions of the RTC in managing a receivership asset
- “Under Rule 20(b), the district court may sever 18 the trial in order to avoid prejudice.”
- plaintiffs “cannot turn around and surprise the [defendant] at 18 the summary judgment stage” with a new theory of liability
- in evaluating a motion for leave to amend, holding 18 that “adding a new theory of liability at the summary judgment stage would prejudice 19 the defendant”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tacha, Goodwin, Brorby
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.