Skip to main content
· 1/28/1964

Home v. Great American Insurance Co.

Citations

  • 134 S.E.2d 865
  • 109 Ga. App. 24
  • 1964 Ga. App. LEXIS 785

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying rule that policies insuring the same entity against the same risk should be considered concurrent even if one policy is more specific than the other
  • applying rule that policies insuring the same entity against the same risk should be considered concurrent even if one policy is more specific than the other
  • “the insurance policies involved in that case [Hartford] contained provisions limiting liability to the excess over any specific insurance carried by the insured”
  • no challenge was made that a declaratory judgment was not authorized and case did not turn on whether the issue presented was proper for declaratory judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jordan, Bell, Eberhardt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.