· 1/28/1964
Home v. Great American Insurance Co.
Citations
- 134 S.E.2d 865
- 109 Ga. App. 24
- 1964 Ga. App. LEXIS 785
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying rule that policies insuring the same entity against the same risk should be considered concurrent even if one policy is more specific than the other
- applying rule that policies insuring the same entity against the same risk should be considered concurrent even if one policy is more specific than the other
- “the insurance policies involved in that case [Hartford] contained provisions limiting liability to the excess over any specific insurance carried by the insured”
- no challenge was made that a declaratory judgment was not authorized and case did not turn on whether the issue presented was proper for declaratory judgment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jordan, Bell, Eberhardt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.