Home Title Ins. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that a board is not free to disregard the med- ical arbiter’s opinion when “the medical arbiter’s report unambiguously attributed 100 percent of claimant’s reduced * * * range of motion to the accepted injury” in the absence of other evidence
• court will affirm the board's reasonable interpretation of the medical evidence supported by substantial evidence
• “When the medical arbiter’s opinion is ambiguous as to whether the impairment is permanent or caused by the compensable condition, the board must interpret the opinion to determine whether it rates impairment caused by the compensable condition”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).