Home Life Insurance v. Breslerman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court did not err in instructing the jury to determine whether or not State’s witness was an accomplice, even where “[the witness] was a confessed accomplice and was jointly indicted” in the crime (punctuation omitted)
• court did not err in instructing the jury to determine whether or not State’s witness was an accomplice, even where “[the witness] was a confessed accomplice and was jointly indicted” in the crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).