Home Insurance v. Roll

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the “monopoly leveraging claim fails for the same reasons as Plaintiff’s other antitrust claims fail—Plaintiff fails to allege anticompetitive conduct”
• “The Supreme Court has established that a claim for monopoly leveraging ‘presupposes anticompetitive conduct.’ That is, there must be some other conduct that is actionable for Plaintiff’s claim to be cognizable.” (internal citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).