Skip to main content
· 7/10/1984

Home Ins. Co. v. C & G SPORTING GOODS

Citations

  • 453 So. 2d 121

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “As C & G conceded in its own motion, the depositions of its employees showed only that its employees did not recall receiving the letters. That testimony was not competent to prove the negative.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nimmons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.