Home Indemnity Co. v. Hoechst Celanese Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that successor-in-interest under Government deed had a contractual relationship with the United States and could maintain a breach of contract action
• assuming jurisdiction over breach of contract claims founded upon express promises in a real estate deed
• “Absent privity of contract, plaintiffs may not advance their claim against the government.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).