Home Indem. Co. Manchester, NH v. Toombs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rescinding legal malpractice policy as to entire firm based on material misrepresentation in application
• subjective question was irrelevant because “as a matter of law, . . . [the insured] made an objectively false statement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).