Home Depot Supply, Inc. v. Hunter Management, LLC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “even where a nonresident has no physical presence in Georgia, intangible contacts, such as telephone communications, can he sufficient to establish ‘minimum contacts’ which meet the constitutional standard for the exercise of personal jurisdiction”
• holding that “even when a nonresident defendant has no physical presence in Georgia, intangible contacts, such as telephone communications, can be sufficient to establish ‘minimum contacts’ which meet the constitutional standard for the exercise of personal jurisdiction”
• holding that “even when a nonresident defendant has no physical presence in Georgia, intangible contacts, such as telephone communications, 9 Furthermore, our Supreme Court has explained that jurisdiction exists on the basis of transacting business in this state if (1
• holding Georgia had personal jurisdiction over foreign company defendant when it initiated contact with the Georgia plaintiff, payment was handled by defendant, and there was a two-year course of dealing between the parties
• “In Georgia, a defendant who files a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction has the burden of proving lack of jurisdiction.”
• “even where a nonresident defendant has no physical presence in Georgia, intangible contacts, such as telephone communications, can be sufficient to establish ‘minimum contacts’ which meet the constitutional standard for the exercise of personal jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).