Skip to main content
· 3/31/1998

Holzer v. Motorola Lighting, Inc.

Citations

  • 693 N.E.2d 446
  • 295 Ill. App. 3d 963
  • 230 Ill. Dec. 317
  • 1998 Ill. App. LEXIS 195

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a party may not raise a legal theory for the first time in a motion to reconsider or on appeal
  • explaining it is longstanding law to require a legal theory be raised in an initial response
  • explaining it is longstanding law to require a legal theory be raised in an initial response
  • explaining it is longstanding law to require a legal theory be raised in an initial response
  • a party may not raise a legal theory for the first time in a motion to reconsider
  • a necessary party need not be joined if his interests are fully and adequately represented

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.