· 3/31/1998
Holzer v. Motorola Lighting, Inc.
Citations
- 693 N.E.2d 446
- 295 Ill. App. 3d 963
- 230 Ill. Dec. 317
- 1998 Ill. App. LEXIS 195
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a party may not raise a legal theory for the first time in a motion to reconsider or on appeal
- explaining it is longstanding law to require a legal theory be raised in an initial response
- explaining it is longstanding law to require a legal theory be raised in an initial response
- explaining it is longstanding law to require a legal theory be raised in an initial response
- a party may not raise a legal theory for the first time in a motion to reconsider
- a necessary party need not be joined if his interests are fully and adequately represented
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gordon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.