Holz v. Smullan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “expectancy[,] based upon an anticipated continuance of the existing law[,] is not an obligation of contract within the protection of constitutional guarantees”
• “When the parties negotiated their agreement in 1973, existing law provided that parties, by their settlement agreements, could not divest the - 20 - court of its power to modify periodic alimony provisions. [Citation.] Under section 502(f

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).