HOLYOKE MUT. INS., ETC. v. Concrete Equipment

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, in the alternative, the plaintiff “had the right to maintain its action in the name of” an interested party for the plaintiff’s own use and benefit
• action may be maintained directly by subrogated party, as real party in interest, against third party defendant
• a party's right of subrogation is limited by any impediment in the injured party's claim
• a party's right of subrogation is limited by any impediment in the injured party's claim
• subrogee like plaintiff may maintain action in own name as real party in interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).