Skip to main content
· 8/24/2007

Holy Virgin Protection Cathedral of Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia v. Chertoff

Citations

  • 499 F.3d 658
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 20216
  • 2007 WL 2406858

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the discretionary statutes “do not suggest any standards that judges could use to assess exercises of that discretion.”
  • explaining \that decisions to revoke visas previously approved under § 1154 are unequivocally committed to [agency] discretion\
  • explaining “that decisions to revoke visas previously ap- proved under § 1154 are unequivocally committed to [agen- cy] discretion”
  • “Courts normally do not interfere in the internal affairs of religious institutions.”
  • affirming lack of subject matter jurisdiction under § 1252(a)(2)(B

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kanne, Wood, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.