Skip to main content
· 8/7/1964

Holweger v. Great Northern Railway Co.

Citations

  • 130 N.W.2d 354
  • 269 Minn. 83
  • 1964 Minn. LEXIS 755

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the trial court did not err in excluding employee’s opinion on the condition of an automatic coupler involved in an accident where employee did not have personal knowledge of the coupler
  • the extent of defendant’s knowledge of unsafe conditions was relevant with respect to both the quantity and quality of its negligence in permitting the conditions to exist
  • trial court did not abuse discretion in excluding employee’s opinion on condition of automatic coupler involved in accident when evidence failed to show employee had personal knowledge of coupler

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.