Holtzclaw v. DSC Communications Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• authorizing affirmance “on any ground supported by the record, even if it is different from that relied on by the district court”
• “We review a summary judgment de novo, applying the same [Rule 56] standard as did the district court.”
• “We may affirm a summary judgment on any ground supported by the record, even if it is different from that relied on by the district court.” (internal citation omitted)
• “We have never expressly made qualification a prima facie element of an ADEA 73 Id. at 2. retaliation claim, but today we decide that such an element is necessary.”
• “To establish a prima facie retaliation claim under the ADEA, Holtzclaw must show (1) that he engaged in a protected activity, (2) that there was an adverse employment action, and (3
• qualification a prima facie element of an ADEA retaliation claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).