Holt v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, because the time period for appeal is procedural, Rule 4 controlled the time for appeal in a paternity case where the paternity statute itself provided for appeal within 30 days

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• The Sanderson Group, Inc. v. Smith
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2001-08-10· cited 11×
• Hardeman v. Mayfield
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1983-04-06· cited 10×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Alabama Power Co. v. Hamilton
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1977-02-04· cited 9×
• Ralston Purina Co. v. Pierce
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1959-10-04· cited 7×
• Carr v. Samuels
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1969-08-21· cited 4×
• Strickland v. National Gypsum Co.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1976-11-24· cited 3×