· 9/18/1998
Holt v. Olmsted Township Board of Trustees
Citations
- 43 F. Supp. 2d 812
- 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22308
- 1998 WL 937399
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “[T]here may exist an issue of fact concerning whether Defendant’s alleged failure to enforce the smoking ban constitutes an adverse employment action.... ”
- “However, Holt does not fulfill the second prong of her prima facie case requirements .... Holt sets forth no evidence to connect that alleged adverse action to her disability.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Oliver
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.