Skip to main content
· 9/18/1998

Holt v. Olmsted Township Board of Trustees

Citations

  • 43 F. Supp. 2d 812
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22308
  • 1998 WL 937399

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[T]here may exist an issue of fact concerning whether Defendant’s alleged failure to enforce the smoking ban constitutes an adverse employment action.... ”
  • “However, Holt does not fulfill the second prong of her prima facie case requirements .... Holt sets forth no evidence to connect that alleged adverse action to her disability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oliver

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.