Holt v. NAVAPRO

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that medical providers could not be held liable for the “collateral consequences” of the plaintiff’s criminal convictions for robbery and assault
• holding that plaintiff was barred from “benefitting in a civil suit flowing from his criminal convictions” where he committed crimes after escaping from a hospital’s supervision
• “The common law principle that a person should not be permitted to benefit by his own wrongdoing, particularly his own crimes, prevents a plaintiff from recovering losses which flowed from those criminal acts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).