Holt v. Holt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that while teacher’s retirement accounts cannot be considered marital property, a trial court can use the benefits as an economic factor to be weighed in dividing the marital property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Foraker v. Foraker
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2004-03-30· cited 40×
• Farley v. Farley
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2001-05-11· cited 27×
• Dowell v. Dowell
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2006-10-17· cited 22×
• Keller v. Keller
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2000-05-31· cited 21×
• In Re Marriage of Thomas
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2000-06-30· cited 21×
• DeMayo v. DeMayo
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2000-01-25· cited 18×
• Griffin v. Griffin
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1999-03-09· cited 17×
• Lance v. Lance
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1998-11-17· cited 16×
• Laffey v. Laffey
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1999-11-09· cited 13×
• Woodard v. Woodard
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2006-09-19· cited 12×
• Olsen v. Olsen
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2007-09-13· cited 9×
• Messer v. Messer
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2001-04-26· cited 6×
• Litz v. Litz
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2009-04-28· cited 2×