Skip to main content
· 8/6/1985

Holt v. Department of Food & Agriculture

Citations

  • 171 Cal. App. 3d 427
  • 218 Cal. Rptr. 1
  • 1985 Cal. App. LEXIS 2426

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Evidence of the custom or general practice in the same trade 12 or occupation is relevant but not conclusive on the question whether the actor utilized due care.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sparks

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.