District of Columbia· 7/31/2006
Holt v. Davidson
Citations
- 441 F. Supp. 2d 92
- 98 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5682
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51827
- 2006 WL 2106961
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “an action brought under the APA is barred if it concerns the assessment or collection of federal taxes”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Urbina
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Morrow v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2010-07-12· cited 103×
- Ross v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2006-11-10· cited 48×
- Buaiz v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2007-01-24· cited 40×
- Reading v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2007-09-13· cited 24×
- Pollinger v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2008-03-25· cited 24×
- Spahr v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2007-08-17· cited 20×
- Wesselman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2007-08-17· cited 18×
- Kim v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2009-05-26· cited 17×
- Justin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2009-03-24· cited 5×
- Clark v. Estate of FlachDistrict of Columbia· 2009-03-24· cited 4×
- Rae v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2008-01-04· cited 3×
- Hafen v. PendryDistrict of Columbia· 2009-08-25· cited 2×
- Morrow v. United States GovernmentDistrict of Columbia· 2010-07-12
- Hafen v. PembryDistrict of Columbia· 2009-08-25
- Clark v. Tidewater MacK, Inc.District of Columbia· 2009-03-25
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.