Holt v. CHIEF JUDGE OF THIRTEENTH JUD. CIR.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that digital electronic court reporting systems used in courtrooms capture statements and conversations that are not part of the judicial proceeding or that are not meant to be “on the record”
• explaining that digital electronic court reporting systems used in courtrooms capture statements and conversations that are not part of the judicial proceeding or that are not meant to be \on the record\
• noting concern with respect to the unintended recording of confidential conversations in a court proceeding
• first citing 1-888-Traffic Sch. v. Chief Circuit Judge, Fourth Judicial Circuit, 734 So.2d 413 (Fla. 1999); then citing Hatcher v. Davis, 798 So.2d 765, 765-66 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).