Holsopple v. Village Green-Trilogy Health Servs., L.L.C.
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 3729
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in entering judgment against appellant on her complaint for reimbursement of $5,680 from appellee for the cost of her mother's stay at appellee's assisted-living facility. Appellant signed a private-pay agreement obligating herself to pay for her mother's stay, and the weight of the evidence supported a finding that the cost was not eligible for Medicare reimbursement. Further, the weight of the evidence did not support a finding that appellee had engaged in any fraud or other wrongdoing that would justify ordering appellee to reimburse appellant. Judgment affirmed.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Due Process clause demands no more than a “reasonable fit” between governmental purpose and the means chosen to advance that purpose
- holding that the Due Process clause demands no more than a \reasonable fit\ between governmental purpose and the means chosen to advance that purpose
- ruling that limited release policies for juvenile alien detainees do not facially violate due process
- holding that a plaintiff mounting a facial challenge show “no set of circumstances” under which the statute would be valid
- recognizing that the purpose of the juvenile release regulation 3 is to “protect the welfare of the juvenile” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
- ruling that limited release policies for juvenile alien detainees do not facially violate due process
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.